<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Double Stochastic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tuckerreport.com/indicators/doublesto/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tuckerreport.com</link>
	<description>Technical Analysis of the financial markets, and other thoughts on trading</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 14:50:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chart of E-Mini Dow Futures for Friday, 18 Feb 2011 &#171; Strategesis</title>
		<link>http://tuckerreport.com/indicators/doublesto/comment-page-1/#comment-20045</link>
		<dc:creator>Chart of E-Mini Dow Futures for Friday, 18 Feb 2011 &#171; Strategesis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2011 20:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuckerreport.com/indicators/doublesto/#comment-20045</guid>
		<description>[...] Cyclone [Dim-gray background, red/green signal line]: The Cyclone indicator is based on the commonly-used Stochastics indicator. It computes %K exactly the same, but computes %D using a triple-exponential moving average (instead of using a simple moving average.) As I normally use it, I don&#8217;t even have it show the plot of %K (it can, if desired.) I do have it show %D as a thin, dotted gold line. But for trading, I rely more on the Inverse Fisher Transform of %D, which is plotted as a relatively thick line whose color shifts between red and green (red when the line is moving down, green when it is moving up.) Also plotted as a thin gold/orange line is the inverse Fisher Transform of %D of Cyclone applied to %K recursively (my variation of &#8220;Double Stochastics.&#8221;) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cyclone [Dim-gray background, red/green signal line]: The Cyclone indicator is based on the commonly-used Stochastics indicator. It computes %K exactly the same, but computes %D using a triple-exponential moving average (instead of using a simple moving average.) As I normally use it, I don&#8217;t even have it show the plot of %K (it can, if desired.) I do have it show %D as a thin, dotted gold line. But for trading, I rely more on the Inverse Fisher Transform of %D, which is plotted as a relatively thick line whose color shifts between red and green (red when the line is moving down, green when it is moving up.) Also plotted as a thin gold/orange line is the inverse Fisher Transform of %D of Cyclone applied to %K recursively (my variation of &#8220;Double Stochastics.&#8221;) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Tucker</title>
		<link>http://tuckerreport.com/indicators/doublesto/comment-page-1/#comment-8212</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Tucker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuckerreport.com/indicators/doublesto/#comment-8212</guid>
		<description>The double stochastic is a different formula than a regular stochastic. Changing the parameters of a regular stochastic won&#039;t simulate the double stochastic. You need to actually imped the regular stochastic within another stochastic formula. You might be able to find the formula already written in eSignal if you google around or check the forums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The double stochastic is a different formula than a regular stochastic. Changing the parameters of a regular stochastic won&#8217;t simulate the double stochastic. You need to actually imped the regular stochastic within another stochastic formula. You might be able to find the formula already written in eSignal if you google around or check the forums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: damniel sternthal</title>
		<link>http://tuckerreport.com/indicators/doublesto/comment-page-1/#comment-8206</link>
		<dc:creator>damniel sternthal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuckerreport.com/indicators/doublesto/#comment-8206</guid>
		<description>Read your article with great interest.
I have access to the standard Stochastics on eSignal with inputs %K, %K, %D for modifying it.
What are the parameters for the %K, %K, %D for the Double Stochastic.
Thanks....Daniel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read your article with great interest.<br />
I have access to the standard Stochastics on eSignal with inputs %K, %K, %D for modifying it.<br />
What are the parameters for the %K, %K, %D for the Double Stochastic.<br />
Thanks&#8230;.Daniel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://tuckerreport.com/indicators/doublesto/comment-page-1/#comment-2836</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 19:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuckerreport.com/indicators/doublesto/#comment-2836</guid>
		<description>Hi,
The writeup(s) are well conceptualized and content is very helpful in expressing the viewpoints. Great Work, Appreciate the same. 
On the issue of not giving any parameter settings etc., i agree that these are proprietory studies and one should set up what&#039;s workable for them, however if you could provide any info or links to obtain such parameter settings in order to further understand the subject shall be just great. Once again, great work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
The writeup(s) are well conceptualized and content is very helpful in expressing the viewpoints. Great Work, Appreciate the same.<br />
On the issue of not giving any parameter settings etc., i agree that these are proprietory studies and one should set up what&#8217;s workable for them, however if you could provide any info or links to obtain such parameter settings in order to further understand the subject shall be just great. Once again, great work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JR Smith</title>
		<link>http://tuckerreport.com/indicators/doublesto/comment-page-1/#comment-2222</link>
		<dc:creator>JR Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 21:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuckerreport.com/indicators/doublesto/#comment-2222</guid>
		<description>Is there a ninja scriptfile available for the Double Stochastin indicator?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a ninja scriptfile available for the Double Stochastin indicator?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Davis</title>
		<link>http://tuckerreport.com/indicators/doublesto/comment-page-1/#comment-1578</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 02:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuckerreport.com/indicators/doublesto/#comment-1578</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for this Doug&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this Doug</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Williams</title>
		<link>http://tuckerreport.com/indicators/doublesto/comment-page-1/#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 18:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuckerreport.com/indicators/doublesto/#comment-341</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using the 10 period double stochastic (DS) to trade the QQQQ, by waiting for the 60 minute DS to turn up thru 10 (or down thru 90) then entering each time the direction of the 15 minute DS aligns with the direction of the 60 minute DS (i.e when the 60 and 15 minute DS&#039;s are both rising or falling). But as your article addresses, I have been missing extended rallies as the DS&#039;s stay overbought (or oversold). So per your example, I&#039;ve overlaid both the 5 and 10 period DS&#039;s (in both timeframes), and will see if that makes a difference in terms of:
1. Good Long entries using 5 DS dips when the 10 DS is &#039;overbought&#039;
2.  Using the 5 DS for a slighly earlier long entry (i.e while the 10 DS is less than 10 and flat, but not yet turned up).

It looks like you use 80/20 for your upper/lower crossovers (vs my 90/10). I&#039;ll have to watch for which works better with both DS&#039;s.

Also combining two DS&#039;s in two time frames may create confusing signals or may add additional confirmation .... time will tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using the 10 period double stochastic (DS) to trade the QQQQ, by waiting for the 60 minute DS to turn up thru 10 (or down thru 90) then entering each time the direction of the 15 minute DS aligns with the direction of the 60 minute DS (i.e when the 60 and 15 minute DS&#8217;s are both rising or falling). But as your article addresses, I have been missing extended rallies as the DS&#8217;s stay overbought (or oversold). So per your example, I&#8217;ve overlaid both the 5 and 10 period DS&#8217;s (in both timeframes), and will see if that makes a difference in terms of:<br />
1. Good Long entries using 5 DS dips when the 10 DS is &#8216;overbought&#8217;<br />
2.  Using the 5 DS for a slighly earlier long entry (i.e while the 10 DS is less than 10 and flat, but not yet turned up).</p>
<p>It looks like you use 80/20 for your upper/lower crossovers (vs my 90/10). I&#8217;ll have to watch for which works better with both DS&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Also combining two DS&#8217;s in two time frames may create confusing signals or may add additional confirmation &#8230;. time will tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hank W. denHaring</title>
		<link>http://tuckerreport.com/indicators/doublesto/comment-page-1/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank W. denHaring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 04:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuckerreport.com/indicators/doublesto/#comment-239</guid>
		<description>Hi there!
Interesting article! How do you set up a double stochastic like that? I have a normal charting package and can make changes to the Stochastics.
I&#039;d appreciate your help!
Thanks!
Hank</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there!<br />
Interesting article! How do you set up a double stochastic like that? I have a normal charting package and can make changes to the Stochastics.<br />
I&#8217;d appreciate your help!<br />
Thanks!<br />
Hank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
