<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Chat Room with the Magic Indicator</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tuckerreport.com/articles/magic-indicator/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tuckerreport.com</link>
	<description>Technical Analysis of the financial markets, and other thoughts on trading</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 04:05:54 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: forex day trading signals</title>
		<link>http://tuckerreport.com/articles/magic-indicator/comment-page-1/#comment-11009</link>
		<dc:creator>forex day trading signals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuckerreport.com/articles/the-chat-room-with-the-magic-indicator/#comment-11009</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;forex day trading signals...&lt;/strong&gt;

The TrackBack specification was created by Six Apart, who first implemented it in their Movable Type blogging software in August...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>forex day trading signals&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The TrackBack specification was created by Six Apart, who first implemented it in their Movable Type blogging software in August&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poppadom Dave</title>
		<link>http://tuckerreport.com/articles/magic-indicator/comment-page-1/#comment-10508</link>
		<dc:creator>Poppadom Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuckerreport.com/articles/the-chat-room-with-the-magic-indicator/#comment-10508</guid>
		<description>Read this article years ago. Returning to it now after having some success with a stripped down CCI system. 

To be honest, I never bothered looking into the CCI club because there&#039;s so much crap on the homepage. Gave me a headache just looking at it. Don&#039;t like talking to others anyway.

I came across the CCI pdf and just adapted the system after 5 minutes of trying it. Looking at the CCI patterns is a good idea - even if they are lifted from other sources. And I did need to get rid of prices but only when starting out in demo trading to gain trust in the system. 

A fast setting (CCI 14) is only good for trying to get a tight entry / exit in a nice long trend. No good trying to trade noise - you&#039;ll get cut up and bleed to death. You need to look at the price conditions to know that. A slower value works better to absorb noise BUT only with your own set of management rules in addition to the less important CCI rules.

A CCI chart is almost similar to a MACD chart , e.g. 5 minute CCI 34 and 5 minute 4,34,14 MACD. The strength is in the patterns, not the indicator. Even then, you can be very successful with just the ZLX and ZLR patterns as a trend follower in the right markets but only with your own money and stop-loss rules to protect yourself with (You WILL suffer losses). On it&#039;s own, WCCI will &#039;probably&#039; not work (in present conditions).  Discretion overlays the mechanical.

Due diligence, people. Put in the ground work before committing money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this article years ago. Returning to it now after having some success with a stripped down CCI system. </p>
<p>To be honest, I never bothered looking into the CCI club because there&#8217;s so much crap on the homepage. Gave me a headache just looking at it. Don&#8217;t like talking to others anyway.</p>
<p>I came across the CCI pdf and just adapted the system after 5 minutes of trying it. Looking at the CCI patterns is a good idea &#8211; even if they are lifted from other sources. And I did need to get rid of prices but only when starting out in demo trading to gain trust in the system. </p>
<p>A fast setting (CCI 14) is only good for trying to get a tight entry / exit in a nice long trend. No good trying to trade noise &#8211; you&#8217;ll get cut up and bleed to death. You need to look at the price conditions to know that. A slower value works better to absorb noise BUT only with your own set of management rules in addition to the less important CCI rules.</p>
<p>A CCI chart is almost similar to a MACD chart , e.g. 5 minute CCI 34 and 5 minute 4,34,14 MACD. The strength is in the patterns, not the indicator. Even then, you can be very successful with just the ZLX and ZLR patterns as a trend follower in the right markets but only with your own money and stop-loss rules to protect yourself with (You WILL suffer losses). On it&#8217;s own, WCCI will &#8216;probably&#8217; not work (in present conditions).  Discretion overlays the mechanical.</p>
<p>Due diligence, people. Put in the ground work before committing money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Bignan</title>
		<link>http://tuckerreport.com/articles/magic-indicator/comment-page-1/#comment-9146</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Bignan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 23:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuckerreport.com/articles/the-chat-room-with-the-magic-indicator/#comment-9146</guid>
		<description>Ok, I read this whole blog as well as the comments. Here are my findings.

I am a successful trader. I have MANY setups and methodologies. I have more than I know what to do with. I have a limited amount of capital, but it continues to grow and I am now managing other people&#039;s money now as well.

I often tell anyone who will listen what I do and how I do it. Usually friends or people that I want to help. I also would have no problem sharing what I know for a fee.

I can make money with nothing more than a yahoo chart and a DOM. That&#039;s because I spent many years watching ticks.

The most important piece of trading is money management. You can flip a coin for entry. It&#039;s how you manage the trade that makes the difference. Thus if I &quot;taught&quot; someone how to trade, it would be less about setups and more about management and psychology.

The &quot;wholly&quot; grail is about being a &quot;whole&quot; person mentally and financially. Thus successful trading or ANY success will be a by product of said.

Now as far as WCCI. Leave him alone. There is nothing wrong with a guru or anything of the like, just like there is nothing wrong with random entry and good management. My point is that two people with equally accounts, both sitting in the WCCI room, with BOTH get different results. I can understand why they want to shut those people up who are contrary to the mission. It&#039;s because people have a sense of something that works FOR THEM and if you come in there and get negative, you might mess them up. If you want to question his methods or his cult, then make a new website and let people visit and discuss it there. What I mean is this. I absolutely don&#039;t want anyone&#039;s opinion when I am in a trade. I will hide all I can from the world because they will mess me up.

I can tell you first hand that I have shared some VERY nice secrets I have learned and ironically, I have received responses similar to that of what Doug Tucker has provided herein. This is not to say that Doug doesn&#039;t provide value, but rather anyone from WCCI could come and critic&#039; his site equally to the way he criticized theirs.

Bottom line. Stop whining, Shut up, and trade. The real secret to this game is capital. You 1-5 lot traders will get killed out there or make a little lose a little. The way to survive is capital and position sizing.

I&#039;m out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I read this whole blog as well as the comments. Here are my findings.</p>
<p>I am a successful trader. I have MANY setups and methodologies. I have more than I know what to do with. I have a limited amount of capital, but it continues to grow and I am now managing other people&#8217;s money now as well.</p>
<p>I often tell anyone who will listen what I do and how I do it. Usually friends or people that I want to help. I also would have no problem sharing what I know for a fee.</p>
<p>I can make money with nothing more than a yahoo chart and a DOM. That&#8217;s because I spent many years watching ticks.</p>
<p>The most important piece of trading is money management. You can flip a coin for entry. It&#8217;s how you manage the trade that makes the difference. Thus if I &#8220;taught&#8221; someone how to trade, it would be less about setups and more about management and psychology.</p>
<p>The &#8220;wholly&#8221; grail is about being a &#8220;whole&#8221; person mentally and financially. Thus successful trading or ANY success will be a by product of said.</p>
<p>Now as far as WCCI. Leave him alone. There is nothing wrong with a guru or anything of the like, just like there is nothing wrong with random entry and good management. My point is that two people with equally accounts, both sitting in the WCCI room, with BOTH get different results. I can understand why they want to shut those people up who are contrary to the mission. It&#8217;s because people have a sense of something that works FOR THEM and if you come in there and get negative, you might mess them up. If you want to question his methods or his cult, then make a new website and let people visit and discuss it there. What I mean is this. I absolutely don&#8217;t want anyone&#8217;s opinion when I am in a trade. I will hide all I can from the world because they will mess me up.</p>
<p>I can tell you first hand that I have shared some VERY nice secrets I have learned and ironically, I have received responses similar to that of what Doug Tucker has provided herein. This is not to say that Doug doesn&#8217;t provide value, but rather anyone from WCCI could come and critic&#8217; his site equally to the way he criticized theirs.</p>
<p>Bottom line. Stop whining, Shut up, and trade. The real secret to this game is capital. You 1-5 lot traders will get killed out there or make a little lose a little. The way to survive is capital and position sizing.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Van Dyke</title>
		<link>http://tuckerreport.com/articles/magic-indicator/comment-page-1/#comment-9058</link>
		<dc:creator>David Van Dyke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuckerreport.com/articles/the-chat-room-with-the-magic-indicator/#comment-9058</guid>
		<description>After nearly two years of WCCI study and research, I find it is necesasry to screen out many signals.  I find Stoc helpful to screen out some, and observing the price action screens out others.  I have found the Hood from Extreme, which Woodie no longer uses, produces the best results, and the 100 lines are great for exiting or entering trades, but be prepared to exit quick if it retraces.  When they stopped posting results, right after I joined, I became very suspicious.  I also believe the longer time frames offer a better chance by eliminating the static.
     I have not used the range bars.  Perhaps there are other indicators that will help eliminate the bad signals.  I lost for a full year.  Now I make money by paying attention to support and resistance, trend direction, combining common technical knowledge, fibonacchi, Elliot Wave.  How much credit is left to go to CCI?  I have no way to measure.  I know the zero line reject is sure good for losers.  You must have a very strong trend to have any success with zero line rejects.  Anyone got any help for me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After nearly two years of WCCI study and research, I find it is necesasry to screen out many signals.  I find Stoc helpful to screen out some, and observing the price action screens out others.  I have found the Hood from Extreme, which Woodie no longer uses, produces the best results, and the 100 lines are great for exiting or entering trades, but be prepared to exit quick if it retraces.  When they stopped posting results, right after I joined, I became very suspicious.  I also believe the longer time frames offer a better chance by eliminating the static.<br />
     I have not used the range bars.  Perhaps there are other indicators that will help eliminate the bad signals.  I lost for a full year.  Now I make money by paying attention to support and resistance, trend direction, combining common technical knowledge, fibonacchi, Elliot Wave.  How much credit is left to go to CCI?  I have no way to measure.  I know the zero line reject is sure good for losers.  You must have a very strong trend to have any success with zero line rejects.  Anyone got any help for me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DB</title>
		<link>http://tuckerreport.com/articles/magic-indicator/comment-page-1/#comment-7606</link>
		<dc:creator>DB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuckerreport.com/articles/the-chat-room-with-the-magic-indicator/#comment-7606</guid>
		<description>I have searched the Web and NEVER found anyone who has claimed success with WCCI. His new book is a disaster. The PFG manual located FREE on his site is better. But W never says EXACTLY where to enter or exit. He just offers &quot;suggestions.&quot; When you really dig into Woodie&#039;s info., you fund there are NO exact rules, and no mention of price. I followed him for 2 years. The chat room will quickly ostracize you if you write anything negative. Or your &quot;critical&quot; question will just be ignored or shrugged off with a quick word or two. Forget it. And do NOT waste your money on the DVD set. Oh, and I did nothing but lose money on Woodie&#039;s &quot;nebulous&quot; setups.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have searched the Web and NEVER found anyone who has claimed success with WCCI. His new book is a disaster. The PFG manual located FREE on his site is better. But W never says EXACTLY where to enter or exit. He just offers &#8220;suggestions.&#8221; When you really dig into Woodie&#8217;s info., you fund there are NO exact rules, and no mention of price. I followed him for 2 years. The chat room will quickly ostracize you if you write anything negative. Or your &#8220;critical&#8221; question will just be ignored or shrugged off with a quick word or two. Forget it. And do NOT waste your money on the DVD set. Oh, and I did nothing but lose money on Woodie&#8217;s &#8220;nebulous&#8221; setups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://tuckerreport.com/articles/magic-indicator/comment-page-1/#comment-7359</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 00:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuckerreport.com/articles/the-chat-room-with-the-magic-indicator/#comment-7359</guid>
		<description>Doug,
Well done. I have been around Woodies chat room for about a year. In my opinion, your conclusions are fair. I sim traded 15 tick range bar for 8 months and compiled stats on hundreds of trades just to realize that if you simply TRADE THE DAMN PATTERNS blindly you will LOOSE YOUR DAMN ACCOUNT. However, if you analyze your stats carefully, and become more selective based on your stats, CCI ( not necessarily woodies patterns ) offer a good building block to a profitable trading plan.
To make your analysis of Woodies group complete, I must add one observation; perhaps not the entire PFG Best as an organization but definitely Neil Rogers is a piece of shit not just as a broker but also as a person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug,<br />
Well done. I have been around Woodies chat room for about a year. In my opinion, your conclusions are fair. I sim traded 15 tick range bar for 8 months and compiled stats on hundreds of trades just to realize that if you simply TRADE THE DAMN PATTERNS blindly you will LOOSE YOUR DAMN ACCOUNT. However, if you analyze your stats carefully, and become more selective based on your stats, CCI ( not necessarily woodies patterns ) offer a good building block to a profitable trading plan.<br />
To make your analysis of Woodies group complete, I must add one observation; perhaps not the entire PFG Best as an organization but definitely Neil Rogers is a piece of shit not just as a broker but also as a person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woodies CCI Club Junkies &#171; TradingBlog</title>
		<link>http://tuckerreport.com/articles/magic-indicator/comment-page-1/#comment-4947</link>
		<dc:creator>Woodies CCI Club Junkies &#171; TradingBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuckerreport.com/articles/the-chat-room-with-the-magic-indicator/#comment-4947</guid>
		<description>[...] was also sent in link to another site that also addresses these issues.   http://tuckerreport.com/articles/magic-indicator/ Check it out &amp; if you come across similar info at other sites,  send them in Ill add them [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was also sent in link to another site that also addresses these issues.   http://tuckerreport.com/articles/magic-indicator/ Check it out &amp; if you come across similar info at other sites,  send them in Ill add them [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tobi</title>
		<link>http://tuckerreport.com/articles/magic-indicator/comment-page-1/#comment-4799</link>
		<dc:creator>tobi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 04:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuckerreport.com/articles/the-chat-room-with-the-magic-indicator/#comment-4799</guid>
		<description>i have success with wcci. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have success with wcci. <img src='http://tuckerreport.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pipsqueak4x</title>
		<link>http://tuckerreport.com/articles/magic-indicator/comment-page-1/#comment-3751</link>
		<dc:creator>pipsqueak4x</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuckerreport.com/articles/the-chat-room-with-the-magic-indicator/#comment-3751</guid>
		<description>Doug,  
Nice reporting, writing and basically, very well done journal-ism. You kept good notes, found the salient points, involved yourself in intensive back-testing with TS and reported these points of understanding you arrived at. Thanks, as this depth of involvement is not so common among those who will backtest a strategy and convince themselves and others that they have discovered something closely related to the Holy Grail of trading profits in minutes or a few hours or weeks. A trader is tempered by a strong fire in the pits and pounded with a hammer, to get out the impurities and useless space, and finally becomes a very strong piece steel, capable of cutting through all the BS of our common &quot;get rich quick&quot; and technologically interactive &quot;wisdom transfer&quot; sites / rooms.

Nothing,   but the extensive experience from observing price action and the deep involvment of time to gaining awareness of the practical sensitivity of mathematical indicators,   can ASSIST in managing open positions. Most are quickly searching to find fantasy-level entries and exits, and our technological culture has the tools to provide such sanctuaries, with walls lined with mirrors, reflecting only that which is in the room. 

Our brain, combined with real experience, will always be a better trade manager and indicator, than an algorithm (at least at this stage of market evolution). We can use them as tools, but the ability to manage oneself (rather than managing one&#039;s computer) will take precedence in trading profitably over the magical indicators that can be found at the corner market. All lasting traders seem to start simple, get very complex, and then return to simplicity, when simplicity was finally understood through the journey through complexity. All the rest of the 90% (or whatever percentage) will be looking for someone to tell them how to believe (and such is all of human history it seems without too much contradictory evidence).

Keep up the excellent writing. Your eyes see well, your hands type with precision.

Cheers Mate!

ryan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug,<br />
Nice reporting, writing and basically, very well done journal-ism. You kept good notes, found the salient points, involved yourself in intensive back-testing with TS and reported these points of understanding you arrived at. Thanks, as this depth of involvement is not so common among those who will backtest a strategy and convince themselves and others that they have discovered something closely related to the Holy Grail of trading profits in minutes or a few hours or weeks. A trader is tempered by a strong fire in the pits and pounded with a hammer, to get out the impurities and useless space, and finally becomes a very strong piece steel, capable of cutting through all the BS of our common &#8220;get rich quick&#8221; and technologically interactive &#8220;wisdom transfer&#8221; sites / rooms.</p>
<p>Nothing,   but the extensive experience from observing price action and the deep involvment of time to gaining awareness of the practical sensitivity of mathematical indicators,   can ASSIST in managing open positions. Most are quickly searching to find fantasy-level entries and exits, and our technological culture has the tools to provide such sanctuaries, with walls lined with mirrors, reflecting only that which is in the room. </p>
<p>Our brain, combined with real experience, will always be a better trade manager and indicator, than an algorithm (at least at this stage of market evolution). We can use them as tools, but the ability to manage oneself (rather than managing one&#8217;s computer) will take precedence in trading profitably over the magical indicators that can be found at the corner market. All lasting traders seem to start simple, get very complex, and then return to simplicity, when simplicity was finally understood through the journey through complexity. All the rest of the 90% (or whatever percentage) will be looking for someone to tell them how to believe (and such is all of human history it seems without too much contradictory evidence).</p>
<p>Keep up the excellent writing. Your eyes see well, your hands type with precision.</p>
<p>Cheers Mate!</p>
<p>ryan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Taverner</title>
		<link>http://tuckerreport.com/articles/magic-indicator/comment-page-1/#comment-3361</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Taverner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuckerreport.com/articles/the-chat-room-with-the-magic-indicator/#comment-3361</guid>
		<description>great website Doug, just wanted to say that I too have spent more than a year in the free chat room and while the education content is excellent it is rather muddied by the method. I also tracked the trades carefully and found no real expectancy of an adge from the patterns and nuances alone. However when combined with other market information and the price bars (heresey I know) they are useful in that all the patterns are really divergences and over bought / over sold situations. Having been through most of the chat rooms or advisory services on the web and come to the same conclusions as you cite in your article,  I`m left with the same question I had at the beginning, which is, &quot;if you can make money trading, why bother to set up a business selling trading advice?&quot; On the other hand, trading is a lonely occupation and its helpful to have some people to talk to. Otherwise I get bored and just launch a trade to break the waiting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great website Doug, just wanted to say that I too have spent more than a year in the free chat room and while the education content is excellent it is rather muddied by the method. I also tracked the trades carefully and found no real expectancy of an adge from the patterns and nuances alone. However when combined with other market information and the price bars (heresey I know) they are useful in that all the patterns are really divergences and over bought / over sold situations. Having been through most of the chat rooms or advisory services on the web and come to the same conclusions as you cite in your article,  I`m left with the same question I had at the beginning, which is, &#8220;if you can make money trading, why bother to set up a business selling trading advice?&#8221; On the other hand, trading is a lonely occupation and its helpful to have some people to talk to. Otherwise I get bored and just launch a trade to break the waiting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
